beat365体育手机下载-beat365(官方)

Abstract

Abstract:This article is based on the productivity dilemma theory, using provincial data from 2000 to 2017 in china, through the structural decomposition of the technical efficiency of the real economy, analyze the impact of heterogeneous R&D on the persistent technical efficiency of the real economy and the regulatory effects of the government support and market-oriented reforms in it. The results show that persistent technical efficiency growth stagnated is the main reason that restricts the improvement of the overall technical efficiency of the real economy, disruptive innovation has an inhibitory effect on improving the sustainable technical efficiency of the real economy; incremental innovation can promote the continuous technical efficiency of the real economy. To break through the productivity dilemma of the real economy, we must pay attention to the moderating effects of the government and the market on different innovative activities, disruptive innovation needs the strong support of "promising government". incremental innovation pays more attention to the allocation function of the "effective market" and the external effects of the "limited and promising government".

Key words:productivity dilemma,subversive innovation,incremental innovation,government support,market-oriented Reforms

CLC Number:

F204

ZHANG Shuai, LIU Chun-xue, JIANG Rui. The Impact of Heterogeneous R&D and the productivity dilemma-Research based on Government Support and Market-oriented Reforms Moderating Effects[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2021(06): 57-66.

References

[1] 中国经济增长前沿课题组,张平,刘霞辉,等.中国经济增长的低效率冲击与减速治理[J]. 经济研究,2014,49(12):4~17;32.
[2] 于斌斌.产业结构调整与生产率提升的经济增长效应——基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析[J]. 中国工业经济,2015(12):83~98.
[3] 蔡跃洲,付一夫.全要素生产率增长中的技术效应与结构效应——基于中国宏观和产业数据的测算及分解[J]. 经济研究,2017,52(1):72~88.
[4] Pritchett, L., Summers, L. H. Asia-Phoria Meet Regression to the Mean[J]. Proceedings, 2013(9):1~35.
[5] 李静,楠玉.人才为何流向公共部门——减速期经济稳增长困境及人力资本错配含义[J]. 财贸经济,2019,40(2):20~33.
[6] 龚刚,黄春媛,张前程,等.从技术引进走向自主研发——论新阶段下的中国经济增长方式[J]. 经济学动态,2013(5):16~26.
[7] Abernathy. The Productivity Dilemma:Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1980,18(1):127~128.
[8] 简泽,徐扬,李玉花,等.生产率困境的形成与治理机制:一个新的理论框架[J]. 管理世界,2020,36(1):193~211;248.
[9] 赖平耀.中国经济增长的生产率困境:扩大投资下的增长下滑[J]. 世界经济,2016,39(1):75~94.
[10] Christensen, C. M. Exploring the Limits of the Technology S-curve. Part I:Component Technologies[J]. Production and Operations Management, 1992,1(4):334~357.
[11] Christensen, C. M. Exploring the Limits of the Technology S-curve. Part II:Architectural Technologies[J]. Production and Operations Management, 1992, 1(4):358~366.
[12] Yu, D., Chang, C.H. A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12(4):435~452.
[13] Feldman, Martha. Pentland, Brian. Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(1):94~118.
[14] March, J.G., Shapira, Z. Variable Risk Preferences and the Focus of Attention.[J]. Psychological Review, 1992, 99(1):172~183.
[15] Zhou, K. Z., Wu, F. Technology Capability, Strategic Flexibility, and Product Innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 31(5):547~561.
[16] 解维敏,唐清泉,陆姗姗.政府R&D资助,企业R&D支出与自主创新——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究,2009(6):86~99.
[17] 张杰,郑文平,翟福昕.竞争如何影响创新:中国情景的新检验[J]. 中国工业经济,2014(11):56~68.
[18] 郭研,郭迪,姜坤.市场失灵、政府干预与创新激励——对科技型中小企业创新基金的实证检验[J]. 经济科学,2016(3):114~128.
[19] Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L. Hitting the Nail on the Head:Exploring the Relationship between Public Subsidies and Open Innovation Efficiency[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 118(5):213~225.
[20] 冯宗宪,王青,侯晓辉.政府投入、市场化程度与中国工业企业的技术创新效率[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2011,28(4):3~17;33.
[21] 王文,孙早.中国地区间研发资源错配测算与影响因素分析[J]. 财贸经济,2020,41(5):67~83.
[22] 杨洋,魏江,罗来军.谁在利用政府补贴进行创新——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J]. 管理世界,2015(1):75~86;98;188.
[23] 叶祥松,刘敬.政府支持与市场化程度对制造业科技进步的影响[J]. 经济研究,2020,55(5):83~98.
[24] Tsionas, E.G., Kumbhakar, S. C. Firm Heterogeneity, Persistent and Transient Technical Inefficiency:A Generalized True Random-Effects Model[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2014, 29(1):110~132.
[25] Colombi,R., Kumbhakar, S. C., Martini,G. M., et al. Closed-skew Normality in Stochastic Frontiers with Individual Effects and Long/Short Run Efficiency[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,2014, 42(2):123~136.
[26] Chen, Y. Y., Schmin, P., Wang, H. J. Consistent Estimation of the Fixed Effects Stochastic Frontier Model[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2014, 181(2):65~76.
[27] Lai, H. P.,Kumbhakar, S. C. Panel Data Stochastic Frontier Model with Determinants of Persistent and Transient Inefficiency[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018,271(2):746~755.
[28] 孙早,许薛璐.优先升级传统产业还是重在培育先进产业——新科技革命时代的产业战略抉择[J]. 财贸经济,2020,41(9):117~130.
[29] 张杰,陈志远,吴书凤,等.对外技术引进与中国本土企业自主创新[J]. 经济研究,2020,55(7):92~105.
[30] 叶祥松,刘敬.异质性研发、政府支持与中国科技创新困境[J]. 经济研究,2018,53(9):116~132.
[31] 白俊红,吕晓红.自主研发、协同创新与外资引进——来自中国地区工业企业的经验证据[J]. 财贸经济,2014(11):89~100.
[32] 王文,孙早.基础研究还是应用研究:谁更能促进TFP增长——基于所有制和要素市场扭曲的调节效应分析[J]. 当代经济科学,2016,38(6):23-33;123.
[33] 孙早,许薛璐.前沿技术差距与科学研究的创新效应——基础研究与应用研究谁扮演了更重要的角色[J]. 中国工业经济,2017(3):5~23.
[34] Lin, J. Y., Tan, G. Policy Burdens, Accountability, and the Soft Budget Constraint[J]. The American Economic Review, 1999, 89(2):426~431.
[35] 陈家喜,汪永成.政绩驱动:地方政府创新的动力分析[J]. 政治学研究,2013(4):50~56.
[36] 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究,2016,51(4):60~73.
[37] 张杰,郑文平.创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么?[J]. 经济研究,2018,53(5):28~41.
[38] 叶祥松,刘敬.政府支持与市场化程度对制造业科技进步的影响[J]. 经济研究,2020,55(5):83~98.
[39] 江新峰,张敦力.官员激励、产业政策执行与产能过剩——基于企业投资同群效应的分析[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2018,38(7):88~102.
[40] 张杰,宣璐.中国的产业政策:站在何处?走向何方?[J]. 探索与争鸣,2016(11):97~103.
[41] 周波,吕思锜,侯帅圻.政府生产性支出对私人投资的挤出和挤入效应——基于地区异质性的分析[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020(1):113~126.
[42] 黄群慧.论新时期中国实体经济的发展[J]. 中国工业经济,2017(9):5~24.
[43] 吴延兵.自主研发、技术引进与生产率——基于中国地区工业的实证研究[J]. 经济研究,2008(8):51~64.
[44] 陈海强,韩乾,吴锴.融资约束抑制技术效率提升吗——基于制造业微观数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究,2015(10):148~162.

The Impact of Heterogeneous R&D and the productivity dilemma-Research based on Government Support and Market-oriented Reforms Moderating Effects

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments