Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics››2019››Issue (06): 92-101.
Previous ArticlesNext Articles
LAI Yue1, LIU Yi-yi2
Received:
2019-05-23Online:
2019-11-15Published:
2019-11-28CLC Number:
LAI Yue, LIU Yi-yi. Understanding ‘the Poor's Mind’: An Empirical Study on Risk Attitudes of Poor Farmers with the Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Minority Villages in Western China[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2019(06): 92-101.
[1] Morduch, J. 1995. Income Smoothing and Consumption Smoothing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3):103-114. [2] Yesuf, M. and Bluffstone, R. A. 2009. Poverty, risk aversion, and path dependence in low-income countries:Experimental evidence from Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(4):1022-1037. [3] Lipton, M. 1968. The Theory of Optimizing Peas ant. Journal of Development Studies, 4(1968):327-51. [4] 黄季焜,齐亮,陈瑞剑.技术信息知识, 风险偏好与农民施用农药[J]. 管理世界,2008(5). [5] 陈波.风险态度对回乡创业行为影响的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2009(3). [6] 侯麟科,仇焕广,徐志刚.农户风险偏好对农业生产要素投入的影响[J].农业技术经济,2014(5). [7] 许承明、张建军.社会资本, 异质性风险偏好影响农户信贷与保险互联选择研究[J]. 财贸经济,2012(12). [8] Carter, M. R., and Barrett, C. B. 2006. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty:An asset-based approach. The Journal of Development Studies 42(2):178-199. [9] 邹薇,方迎风.中国农村区域性贫困陷阱研究-基于"群体效应"的视角[J].经济学动态,2012(6). [10] Charness, G. and Viceisza, A. 2015. Three Risk-elicitation Methods in the Field:Evidence from Rural Senegal. Spelman College Faculty Publications. Paper 4. [11] Ye, T. and Wang, M. 2013. Exploring risk attitude by a comparative experimental approach and its implication to disaster insurance practice in China. Journal of Risk Research 16(7):861-878. [12] Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. and Pallak, Michael S. 1984. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4):341-350. [13] Binswanger, H.P. 1980. Attitudes toward Risk:Experimental Measurement in Rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(3):395-407. [14] Binswanger, H.P. 1981. Attitudes Toward Risk:Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India. Economic Journal 91(364):867-890. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||