beat365体育手机下载-beat365(官方)

Abstract

Abstract:Takes a sample of all A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2017 to study the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation and consider the impact of R&D investment heterogeneity and property heterogeneity. Research indicates:The performance of corporate social responsibility and the innovation activities of enterprises show a positive correlation;After considering the heterogeneity of R&D investment, the positive incentive effect of corporate social responsibility performance on the enterprise's exploratory innovation is greater;After considering the heterogeneity of ownership, the positive correlations of the overall innovation activities and exploratory innovation activities between corporate social responsibility performance are more obvious in non-state-owned enterprises.

Key words:corporate social responsibility,enterprise innovation,R&D heterogeneity,nature of property rights

CLC Number:

F276.44

GU Qun, Wang Wen-wen, ZHENG Yang. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Have an Impact on Innovation?-Based on the Heterogeneity of R&D Investment and Nature of Property Right[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2019(06): 66-75.

References

[1] Carroll A B. A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance[J]. Academy of Management Review,1979(4):497-505.
[2] McWilliams A, Siegel D. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance:Correlation or Misspecification?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000(5):603-609.
[3] 鞠晓生,卢荻,虞义华.融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J].经济研究,2013(1):4-16.
[4] 顾群,宋舒然.研发投资、融资约束及经济后果[J].贵州财经学院学报,2013(1):91-94.
[5] Goss A, Roberts G. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans[J].Journal of Banking and Finance. 2011, 35(7):1794-1810.
[6] 李姝,谢晓嫣.民营企业的社会责任、政治关联与债务融资——来自中国资本市场的经验证据[J].南开管理评论,2014(6):30-40;95.
[7] 王建玲,李玥婷,吴璇.企业社会责任报告与债务资本成本——来自中国A股市场的经验证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2016(7):113-124.
[8] 史敏,蔡霞,耿修林.动态环境下企业社会责任、研发投入与债务融资成本——基于中国制造业民营上市公司的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2017(3):111-124.
[9] 李姝,赵颖,童婧.社会责任报告降低了企业权益资本成本吗?——来自中国资本市场的经验证据[J].会计研究,2013(9):64-70.
[10] 张倩,何姝霖,时小贺.企业社会责任对员工组织认同的影响——基于CSR归因调节的中介作用模型[J].管理评论,2015(2):111-119.
[11] 晁罡,程鹏,张水英.基于员工视角的企业社会责任对工作投入影响的实证研究[J].管理学报,2012(6):831-836.
[12] 张新国,吕晶晶.社会责任对企业科技创新能力的影响——基于企业知识型员工视角[J].科技进步与对策,2014(17):86-90.
[13] Turban D B, Greening D W. Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees[J].Academy of Management Journal,1997,40(3):658-672.
[14] Isabel G-á, José-Manuel P L, Isabel M G S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation:A Resource-Based Theory[J].Management Decision,2011,49(10):1709-1727.
[15] 杨战胜,俞峰.政治关联对企业创新影响的机理研究[J].南开经济研究,2014(6):32-43.
[16] Luo X M, Du S L. Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Innovation[J].Marketing Letters,2015,26(4):703-714.
[17] 史会斌,杨东.CEO权力配置对企业双元创新的影响研究[J].软科学,2017(11):49-51+61.
[18] 张兆国,靳小翠,李庚秦.企业社会责任与财务绩效之间交互跨期影响实证研究[J].会计研究,2013(8):32-39+96.
[19] 黄达,陈波.融资约束、代理成本与企业研发效率——基于中国工业上市公司的实证研究[J].价值工程,2014(8):201-203.
[20] 杨柏,林川.企业社会责任与研发投入——代理成本缓解还是财务压力?[J].云南财经大学学报,2016(4):124-131.
[21] Lonka K, Lindblom-Ylainne S, Maury S. The Effect of Study Strategies on Learning from Text[J]. Learning and Instruction,1994(3):253-271.
[22] 疏礼兵.基于需要满足的民营企业社会责任行为动机研究[J].软科学,2012(8):118-122.
[23] 于蔚,汪淼军,金祥荣.政治关联和融资约束:信息效应与资源效应[J].经济研究,2012(9):125-139.
[24] 朱磊,徐晓彤,王春燕.产业环境、管理者任期与企业双元创新投资——来自创业板的经验数据[J].证券市场导报,2017(6):4-11+19.
[25] 李莉,于嘉懿,顾春霞.政治晋升、管理者权力与国有企业创新投资[J].研究与发展管理,2018(4):65-73.
[26] 徐业坤,马光源.地方官员变更与企业产能过剩[J].经济研究,2019(5):129-145.
[27] 林筠,高霞,张敏.利用性与探索式创新对知识型企业创新绩效的双元驱动[J].软科学,2016(5):59-63.
[28] 贾兴平,刘益.外部环境、内部资源与企业社会责任[J].南开管理评论,2014(6):13-18+52.

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Have an Impact on Innovation?-Based on the Heterogeneity of R&D Investment and Nature of Property Right

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles8

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DU Shan, WANG Zhan-jie.Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Investment Efficiency and Corporate Innovation[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2021, 39(01): 52-62.
[2]	DU Jian, SHI Yan-min, YANG Yang.A Study on the Stickness of Enterprise Tax-Burden: From the Perspective of Tax Inspection by Tax Authorities[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 38(02): 56-66.
[3]	GU Qun, YUE Zeng-yan, JIA De-zhi.Can Bank-Share Holding Really Promote the Enterprise Innovation: -Based on Nature of Property Right and R&D Investment Heterogeneity[J]. , 2018, 36(06): 66-71.
[4]	XU Shi-wei, CHEN De-mian, QIAO Ming-zhe.Seller's Corporate Social Responsibility and Buyer's Corporate Value: Buyer's Corporate Social Responsibility as a Mediator[J]. , 2018, 36(02): 38-45.
[5]	CUI Ye-guang, LI Bo.Corporate social responsibility performance, R&D investment and financial performance-Based on the data of listed companies in China[J]. , 2018, 36(02): 60-69.
[6]	DU Jian, WANG Zhao, LIU Xiao-yan.The adequacy of corporate social responsibility information research[J]. , 2017, 35(03): 60-69.
[7]	LIU Pei-sen, LI Hou-jian.Enterprise Innovation Source:the Credit Market or the Stock Market[J]. , 2016, 34(02): 37-50.
[8]	SHEN Yi, XU Guang-hua.The Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility-A Structural Literature Review[J]. , 2016, 35(01): 101-110.